Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of Ticket #1236


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 21, 2011 8:06:48 AM (12 years ago)
Author:
bennylp
Comment:

Second scenario has been fixed by #1300

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #1236 – Description

    v4 v5  
    11Known cases: 
    22 1. offering multiple H.264, with PT=xx and yy, answered with single H.264 with PT=zz, our H.264 SDP negotiator deduce that "zz" match to "xx", but incoming RTP packets use "yy" instead! Note that this also happened before r3526 (permissive H.264 negotiation). 
    3  1. ~~~receiving offer with PT=xx, answering with PT=yy, then peer refuse our RTP packets with PT=xx, peer expects our RTP packets using PT=yy instead!~~~ (fixed by #1300) 
     3 1. ~~receiving offer with PT=xx, answering with PT=yy, then peer refuse our RTP packets with PT=xx, peer expects our RTP packets using PT=yy instead! ~~ (fixed by #1300)