Changeset 1220

Timestamp:

Apr 28, 2007 3:37:49 PM (17 years ago)

Author:

bennylp

Message:

Undo ticket #238

Location:

pjproject/branches/split-3rd-party/pjsip/src

Files:

• pjsip/sip_msg.c (modified) (1 diff)
• pjsip/sip_parser.c (modified) (1 diff)
• test-pjsip/msg_test.c (modified) (5 diffs)

pjproject/branches/split-3rd-party/pjsip/src/pjsip/sip_msg.c

@@ -1726 +1726 @@
     copy_advance_pair(buf, ";received=", 10, hdr->recvd_param);
     copy_advance_pair(buf, ";branch=", 8, hdr->branch_param);
-
-    /* Via's via-extension params should be printed with token spec
-     * according to RFC 3261's generic-param production, but some
-     * endpoint uses pname/pvalue production for these params, by
-     * sending to us Via parameter containing ":".
-     * 
-     * So for interoperability sake, lets allow ":" in Via param.
-
+    
     printed = pjsip_param_print_on(&hdr->other_param, buf, endbuf-buf, 
                                    &pjsip_TOKEN_SPEC,
-                                   &pjsip_TOKEN_SPEC, ';');
-     */
-    printed = pjsip_param_print_on(&hdr->other_param, buf, endbuf-buf, 
-                                   &pjsip_PARAM_CHAR_SPEC,
-                                   &pjsip_PARAM_CHAR_SPEC, ';');
-
+                                   &pjsip_TOKEN_SPEC, ';');
     if (printed < 0)
         return -1;

pjproject/branches/split-3rd-party/pjsip/src/pjsip/sip_parser.c

@@ -1844 +1844 @@
         pj_str_t pname, pvalue;
 
-        /* Via's via-extension params should be printed with token spec
-         * according to RFC 3261's generic-param production, but some
-         * endpoint uses pname/pvalue production for these params, by
-         * sending to us Via parameter containing ":".
-         * 
-         * So for interoperability sake, lets allow ":" in Via param.
         int_parse_param( scanner, pool, &pname, &pvalue);
-         */
-
-        int_parse_uri_param(scanner, pool, &pname, &pvalue);
 
         if (!parser_stricmp(pname, pjsip_BRANCH_STR) && pvalue.slen) {

pjproject/branches/split-3rd-party/pjsip/src/test-pjsip/msg_test.c

@@ -78 +78 @@
     /* Typical response message. */
     "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\n"
-    "Via: SIP/2.0/SCTP server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8;rport;received=192.0.2.1;param=a:b\r\n"
+    "Via: SIP/2.0/SCTP server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8;rport;received=192.0.2.1\r\n"
     "Via: SIP/2.0/UDP bigbox3.site3.atlanta.com;branch=z9hG4bK77ef4c2312983.1;received=192.0.2.2\r\n"
     "Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pc33.atlanta.com;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds ;received=192.0.2.3\r\n"
@@ -176 +176 @@
         }
     }
-    if (!pj_list_empty(&err_list)) {
-        PJ_LOG(3,(THIS_FILE, "   Syntax error in line %d col %d",
-                      err_list.next->line, err_list.next->col));
-        status = -11;
-        goto on_return;
-    }
-
     pj_get_timestamp(&t2);
     pj_sub_timestamp(&t2, &t1);
@@ -561 +554 @@
     pjsip_cseq_hdr *cseq;
     pjsip_msg *msg = pjsip_msg_create(pool, PJSIP_RESPONSE_MSG);
-    pjsip_param *param;
     pjsip_msg_body *body;
 
@@ -568 +560 @@
     msg->line.status.reason = pj_str("OK");
 
-    //"Via: SIP/2.0/SCTP server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8;rport;received=192.0.2.1;param=a:b\r\n"
+    //"Via: SIP/2.0/SCTP server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8;rport;received=192.0.2.1\r\n"
     via = pjsip_via_hdr_create(pool);
     pjsip_msg_add_hdr(msg, (pjsip_hdr*)via);
@@ -576 +568 @@
     via->rport_param = 0;
     via->recvd_param = pj_str("192.0.2.1");
-
-    param = pj_pool_zalloc(pool, sizeof(pjsip_param));
-    param->name = pj_str("param");
-    param->value = pj_str("a:b");
-    pj_list_push_back(&via->other_param, param);
 
     //"Via: SIP/2.0/UDP bigbox3.site3.atlanta.com;branch=z9hG4bK77ef4c2312983.1;received=192.0.2.2\r\n"