Changes between Version 1 and Version 6 of Ticket #113


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 24, 2007 1:47:20 AM (17 years ago)
Author:
bennylp
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #113

    • Property Status changed from new to closed
    • Property Priority changed from normal to major
    • Property Resolution changed from to fixed
    • Property Summary changed from INVITE transaction is not destroyed when ACK has the same branch as the INVITE to INVITE transaction is not destroyed immediately when ACK has the same branch as the INVITE

  • Ticket #113 – Description

    v1 v6  
    11When an ACK to 2xx response has the same Via branch parameter to the INVITE transaction, the invite session does not destroy the INVITE transaction immediately, causing subsequent INVITE to fail with 500/Internal Server Error when the new INVITE comes before the previous INVITE terminates (with timer). 
    22 
     3Note that ACK for 2xx response normally has different branch than the INVITE transaction since it represents separate transaction, so this should be quite a rare situation. 
     4 
    35Thanks Sasa Coh for the report.